Portrait of William Reader

Meet the 2 Most Famous Paintings by William Reader

Updated November 2026 · ranked by our popularity score (searches, visits and orders for each work) · 2 works by William Reader in our catalogue

In short

If you know one William Reader painting, it's probably John II Bankes, MP (1692-1772), as a boy (1702), which hangs in the Kingston Lacy, Wimborne Minster. Our catalogue has 2 works by William Reader. Below are the 2 people know best, each with its year, where to find it and what makes it special.

Most works: Kingston Lacy

Start here: the top 10 William Reader paintings

Where you can see William Reader's paintings

The museum that holds the most of the paintings on this page.

Museum City Works by William Reader Paintings from this list
Kingston Lacy, Wimborne MinsterKingston Lacy Wimborne Minster 2 John II Bankes, MP (1692-1772), as a boy, John I Bankes, MP (1665-1714)

Your questions about William Reader's paintings

Which William Reader painting is the most famous?See the answer

Top of the list is John II Bankes, MP (1692-1772), as a boy (1702).

How many paintings did William Reader create?See the answer

We have 2 works by William Reader in our catalogue.

Where can you see William Reader's famous paintings?See the answer

You'll find most of them in Kingston Lacy (Wimborne Minster). The museum list above has the full breakdown.

Which William Reader pieces can you see at the Kingston Lacy?See the answer

You can see 2 of the pieces on this page at the Kingston Lacy, Wimborne Minster, including John II Bankes, MP (1692-1772), as a boy and John I Bankes, MP (1665-1714).

Can I get a reproduction of a William Reader painting?See the answer

Yes. Every painting on this page is available as a hand-painted oil reproduction or a print, in the size that suits you. Just open the painting's page to order.

Getting to know William Reader

The Shadow of the Master

Maidstone, United Kingdom, provides the setting for the beginning of a life defined by the brush and the patronage of the elite. Born the son of a clergyman, William Reader enters the world of art through the disciplined guidance of Gerard Soest. This apprenticeship shapes his hand, grounding his technique in the traditions of the era. He moves through the social strata of the late seventeenth century, finding himself under the protection of a wealthy nobleman in the west of England. This connection provides the stability necessary for a developing painter to find his footing in a competitive landscape.

The work of Reader often exists in the periphery of history. His name frequently appears in the margins of larger legacies, sometimes obscured by the signatures of more prominent contemporaries. He captures the likenesses of the era, most notably in his portrait of Dr. John Blow, a work that achieved further life through the mezzotint engravings of T. Beckett. While his name may be lost to some, his presence remains etched in the visual record of the period.

A Life of Contrasts

The trajectory of Reader's career reveals a stark shift from the comforts of patronage to the isolation of poverty. His active years span the late seventeenth century, a time of shifting artistic tastes and social upheaval. His output is characterized by the following elements:

  • The influence of Gerard Soest's training on his portraiture style.
  • A connection to the landed gentry through long-term patronage.
  • The preservation of his likeness through the portrait of Dr. John Blow.
  • The final, quiet years spent as a pensioner at the London Charterhouse.

The transition from a painter supported by nobility to a man facing the end of his life in diminished circumstances marks the final chapter of his story. He dies in London, leaving behind a body of work that serves as a window into the social fabric of his time.

The Legacy of the Portraitist

Today, the remnants of his hand are found in significant collections, such as those at Kingston Lacy and Wimborne Minster. These works, including portraits of figures like John Bankes, I, offer a glimpse into the technical skill he maintained throughout his life. His existence is a reminder of the precarious nature of the artistic life in the seventeenth century, where the distance between a nobleman's salon and the London Charterhouse was often a matter of fortune and fate.