Popierius
Vardas Klasė Data

Max Beckmann, Bird's hell (1938). Viešasis domenas Pamatykite šį paveikslą judančios šviesos dėking: piešinį, tikrąsias lakui po esančias spalvas, gryną pigmentą

Faktai

Autorius
Max Beckmann artsdot.com/lt/artists/max-beckmann_lt/
Autoriaus datys
1884 – 1950
Spalvotas
1938
Technika
Oil On Canvas
Judėjimas
Surrealism Dream logic painted with waking precision: impossible things shown as if they were ordinary.
Artistic style
Surrealism
Notable elements or techniques
People, Birds, Cluttered objects
Subject or theme
Chaos and disorder in a room

Kontekste

Bird's hell — Max Beckmann

Kada tai buvo nupiesta?

  1. 1880
  2. 1890
  3. 1900
  4. 1910
  5. 1920
  6. 1930
  7. 1940
  8. 1950

Viršuje esanti eilutė: metai. Žemiau esanti eilutė: kiek metų menmeniui buvo kiekvieno laikotarpio pradžioje ir pabaigoje — 0 gimimo metu, 66 mirtės metu.

Paveikta menininkui būnant 54 metų. Degimo metai: 66. 143 iš 258 šio kūrinio autoriui datuotų darbų mūsų kataloge buvo sukurti anksčiau.

Šviesoplėvis: Max Beckmann gyvenimas (1884–1950) ▲ šis kūrinys, 1938 kiekviena su data pavadinta paveikslėlio, dešimtmečiais

Pirmieji darbai: iki 1928 Pagrindiniai kūrybos metai: 1928–1944 Vėlesni darbai: nuo 1944

Šios trys juostos šio katalogo darbus, turinčius nurodytą datą, skirsto į pirmą ketvirtį, vidurinę dalį ir paskutinį ketvirtį. Jos nėra pilna kūrybos apimtis: retas kūrybos laikotarpis gali būti tiesiog praleista istorinė detalė, o ne tiesiog tylos periodas. Tie patys metai, su šiaame laikotarpyje įrašytu paveikslėlio kūrinio gyvenimu

Palyginti su

Pasirinkite vieną viršuje esantį kūrinį: nurodykite du panašumų su šiuo kūriniu ir vieną skirtumą.

Daugiau šiam kūriniui priderančių darbų: artsdot.com/lt/art/similar/max-beckmann-bird-s-hell-8XYK2S-en/

Spalvos

Matuota iš vaizdo skaitmeniniu būdu

    Pagrindinė spalva

    Black #15110b

    Kataloguota paletė

    • #15110B
    • #C0B8A2
    • #445455
    • #A16D20

    Šios spalvos visoje meno kūryjos paletėje Raskite kitus paveikslus pagal spalvą

    Paletė
    Earthy Dominiruojanti spalvų grupė paveikslėlyje.
    Pagrindinės spalvos pavadinimas
    Black
    Intensyvumas
    Balanced Kiek spalvų yra prisigamintų ir kokios jos yra ryškios – nuo vienos nuolydžios spalvos iki daugybės ryškių tonų.
    Kontrastas
    Statement Kiek spalvų skiriasi šviesos ir ryškumo dėkingai per visą paveikslą.
    Harmonija
    Discordant Palette Kaip spalvos dera tarpusavyje – nuo kontrastuojančių iki visiškai suvienytų.
    Ryškumas
    Deep_shadow Bendras vaizdo šviesumas ar tamsumas, nuo gilių šešėlių iki ryškių šviesos dėliojų.
    Sodrumas
    Balanced Soft Spalvų gryrumas ir intensyvumas svyruoja nuo beveik pilkšų iki visiškai ryškių.

    Kur pasaulyje žiūrima į šį paveikslą?

    • 低于 1%
    • 1–3%
    • 3–8%
    • 8–20%
    • 20% ir daugiau
    Šio paveikslėlio lankytojų duomenys yra per mažai, kad būtų galima suformuoti žemėlapį, todėl čia pateikiamos visos Max Beckmann darbai per pastaruosius dvylika mėnesių — iš viso 54 šalių. Iš kur gauti šie duomenys

    Dešimt pirmなusių šalių

    1. 1 Kinija 19,7%6.200 lankytojų
    2. 2 Jungtinės Amerikos Valstijos 14,3%4.500 lankytojų
    3. 3 Prancūzija 5,7%1.800 lankytojų
    4. 4 Vokietija 5,4%1.700 lankytojų
    5. 5 Ispanija 5,4%1.700 lankytojų
    6. 6 Italija 4,8%1.500 lankytojų
    7. 7 Jungtinė Karalystė 4,4%1.400 lankytojų
    8. 8 Argentina 3,2%1.000 lankytojų
    9. 9 Honkongas 3,2%1.000 lankytojų
    10. 10 Kolumbija 2,9%900 lankytojų
    11. · 44 kitų šalių 31,0%9.800 lankytojų

    Žemėlapyje rasti tris tamsiausias šalis. Ar viena iš jų yra ta, kurioje yra muziejus, saugantis šį paveikslą? Įrašykite vieną priežastį, kodėl žmonės iš toli galėtų jį aplankyti.

    Populiariausi Max Beckmann kūriniai (žiūrėtos dalis: 20)

    1. 1 Naktis (Platė 7) iš Šalo, 1919 47,9%21.300 lankytojų
    2. 2 Geležies tiltas (Frankfurto vaizdas), 1922 10,3%4.600 lankytojų
    3. 3 Didelis Agonijos Vaizdas, 1906 4,5%2.000 lankytojų
    4. 4 Bird's hell, 1938 šis paveikslas 2,5%1.100 lankytojų
    5. 5 Kolumbina, 1950 2,0%900 lankytojų
    6. 6 Odysseus and Calypso, 1943 2,0%900 lankytojų
    7. 7 Aktoriai, 1942 1,8%800 lankytojų
    8. 8 The Old Actress, 1926 1,8%800 lankytojų
    9. 9 Self-Portrait in Florence, 1907 1,3%600 lankytojų
    10. 10 Self Portrait with a Bucket Hat, 1921 1,3%600 lankytojų
    11. 11 Temptation, 1937 1,1%500 lankytojų
    12. 12 Rugby players, 1929 1,1%500 lankytojų
    13. 13 Dancing bar in Baden-Baden, Bayerische St, 1923 1,1%500 lankytojų
    14. 14 Self-Portrait with Trumpet, 1938 0,9%400 lankytojų
    15. 15 Actresses, 1946 0,7%300 lankytojų
    16. 16 Seascape with poplars, 1924 0,7%300 lankytojų
    17. 17 Family Picture, Moma NY, 1920 0,7%300 lankytojų
    18. 18 Still Life with Large Green Fruits 0,7%300 lankytojų
    19. 19 Argonaux 0,7%300 lankytojų
    20. 20 Still Life with Three Skulls 0,4%200 lankytojų

    Kartu šie darbai sudaro 83,5% visos dėmesės, skirtos šio paveikslėlio kūrybai per pastaruosius dvylika mėnesių. Kataloge yra 401 šio kūrybinio veikėjo darbų, iš kurių 79 buvo apžiūrėti bent vieną kartą. Šis paveikslas užima 4 vietą pagal dėmesio lygį, sulaukęs 2,5% tokio dėmens (1.100 apsilankymų). Viskas tas pats, mėnesį po mėnesio

    Sluokslai matuoja dėmesį, o ne kokybę. Pasirinkite viršuje esantį kūrinį ir šį: išvardykite vieną dalyką, kuris gali padaryti paveikslą garsų ne dėl to, kaip gerai jis tapytas.

    Apie šį kūrinį

    Bird's hell — Max Beckmann

    A Symphony of Chaos: Exploring Max Beckmann's "Bird's Hell"

    To stand before Max Beckmann’s Bird's Hell is not merely to observe a painting; it is to be enveloped by an atmosphere—a vibrant, unsettling confluence of human drama and avian frenzy. This masterpiece from 1938 captures a moment suspended in time, yet vibrating with palpable energy. The scene unfolds within what appears to be an over-furnished, almost claustrophobic interior space. It is a tableau vivant of disarray, where the mundane objects of daily life—bowls, cups, bottles, and vases—seem to have accumulated until they form part of the very psychological landscape.

    The sheer density of figures is breathtaking. Dozens of people are interwoven into the composition, some engaged in quiet contemplation, others caught mid-gesture, creating a sense of collective, yet individualized, turmoil. This teeming humanity, coupled with the riotous presence of numerous birds fluttering and perching everywhere, transforms the room into something mythic and deeply unsettling. It speaks to an overstimulation, a sensory overload that mirrors the anxieties of the era in which it was conceived.

    Style, Technique, and Beckmann's Vision

    Beckmann’s technique here is masterful in its ability to convey both meticulous detail and utter chaos. While his early work might have leaned toward academic precision, Bird's Hell showcases a mature style that channels the distorted energy of modernism. His influences—from the stained-glass narratives of medieval art to the emotional depth of Van Gogh—are visible in how he renders light and shadow across the cluttered surfaces. The application of paint is rich, giving weight to every discarded object while allowing the movement of the birds to suggest an almost ephemeral quality.

    The composition itself is a masterclass in controlled pandemonium. Nothing feels accidental; every scattered item, every entangled limb, contributes to a narrative tension that pulls the viewer deeper into its depths. For those considering bringing this powerful aesthetic home through a reproduction, understanding this balance between meticulous rendering and emotional abandon is key—it promises drama without sacrificing artistic integrity.

    Symbolism of Disorder and Humanity

    The symbolism within Bird's Hell is notoriously rich and open to interpretation, which only enhances its enduring power. The birds, often symbols of the spirit or freedom, here seem almost predatory in their numbers, adding a layer of wildness to the human predicament. Coupled with the sheer accumulation of domestic clutter—the bowls, the cups—the painting suggests a critique of modern existence itself: a life so saturated with material possessions and social interaction that it verges on collapse. It is a meditation on excess, on the beautiful burden of too much being.

    The sense of disorder does not equate to meaninglessness; rather, Beckmann elevates this chaos into a profound commentary on the human condition—a place where individual souls struggle against overwhelming societal pressures and sensory input. It invites us to pause our own hurried lives and examine what we are accumulating, both materially and emotionally.

    Emotional Resonance for the Modern Collector

    For the art lover or interior designer seeking a piece with undeniable narrative weight, Bird's Hell offers an unparalleled emotional anchor. It is not a painting meant to soothe; it is one designed to provoke thought, conversation, and deep introspection. Reproducing this work allows one to harness its dramatic energy within a contemporary setting. Imagine the visual impact of such a complex, emotionally charged piece anchoring a room—it becomes the focal point around which all other design elements must orbit.

    Owning or displaying a reproduction of Bird's Hell is an embrace of complexity. It suggests that beauty can be found not just in serene perfection, but within the vibrant, messy, and utterly compelling reality of shared human experience.

    Draugas ir muziejus

    Autorius

    Max Beckmann

    Gimė Leipcigas, Vokietija

    The Life and Art of Max Beckmann

    Max Beckmann was a man of many disciplines, working as a painter, draftsman, printmaker, sculptor, and writer. He entered the world on February 12, 1884, in Leipzig, Saxony. He grew up in an upper-middle-class family as the youngest of three children. His early years were shaped by the quiet stability of his home until 1894, when his father, Carl Beckmann, a grain merchant, passed away. His mother, Antoine Beckmann, remained a central figure in his life as he began to find his way through the complexities of modern existence.

    His work often felt like a confrontation with the reality of the human condition. He did not merely paint scenes; he captured the tension of a changing era through a variety of mediums. His output was vast, ranging from large-scale canvases to intimate prints. He was a man who sought to articulate the weight of history through his hands, often using the tools of his trade to process the shifting landscapes of the twentieth century.

    Self-Portrait in Florence (1907)

    The Night (1919)

    The Iron Bridge (View of Frankfurt) (1922)

    Self-Portrait with Trumpet (1938)

    The Prodigal Son (1949)

    Early Life and Artistic Training

    Born into a middle-class family in Leipzig, Germany, Max Beckmann showed an early inclination toward drawing. His initial sketches revealed a precocious talent that hinted at the depth of his later work. During these formative years, he sought out the rigor of the old traditions, training in a conservative academic style that emphasized technical precision. This grounding in formal technique provided him with a solid foundation, even as his own spirit began to push against the boundaries of conventional methods.

    As he matured, Beckmann found himself drawn to the Old Masters. He spent much of his time studying their compositions and mastery of form, a fascination that would eventually help him develop a strikingly original style. He was not content with mere imitation; instead, he used the lessons of the past to build a personal visual language. This period of study was marked by a tension between his academic training and a growing desire to express something more profound and less structured.

    By 1912, he was already tackling ambitious subjects that required a command of large-scale composition. One such work was his painting of The Sinking of the Titanic, a piece that demonstrated his ability to handle complex, dramatic narratives. At this stage, his work was characterized by academically correct depictions, focusing on the weight and presence of figures within a defined space. He was a history painter at heart, using the grand scale of the past to explore the human condition through a lens of structured, deliberate form.

    Experiences During World War I

    The outbreak of World War I brought a sudden, violent end to Beckmann's academic training. He did not remain a bystander to the conflict; instead, he volunteered to serve in the medical corps. Working as a medical orderly, he was thrust into the direct reality of human suffering. The clinical, structured world of his early training was replaced by the chaotic and harrowing conditions of the front lines.

    The strain of this service eventually became too much to bear. While stationed on the Belgian front, the weight of the war's devastation led to a nervous breakdown. He was discharged from the military in 1915, returning to a life that had been fundamentally altered by what he had witnessed. The horrors he saw during his time in the medical corps ignited a radical shift in his vision. The academic precision of his youth gave way to a new way of seeing, one that reflected a fractured and troubled humanity.

    Artistic Style and Technique

    Beckmann’s visual language was built from a tension between tradition and a restless, modern impulse. He looked back to the Old Masters, finding a foundation in the works of Rembrandt and Rubens, while also drawing from the structured forms of Cézanne and the emotive brushwork of Van Gogh. His compositions often felt crowded and compressed, utilizing shallow space and dark, heavy outlines to push his subjects toward the viewer. This technique created a sense of claustrophobia, as if the figures were trapped within the frame. He frequently paired this distorted figuration with a brutal realism, using his canvases to offer sharp social criticism of the world around him.

    The physical application of paint was central to his expressive power. He favored a masterful impasto technique, applying the medium in thick, gestural brushstrokes that gave his surfaces a palpable, heavy weight. This texture added a sense of urgency to his depictions of human struggle. His interests were not limited to the Western tradition; he also found inspiration in the unsettling, symbolic narratives of Northern European artists like Bosch, Bruegel, and Matthias Grünewald. By blending these influences, he developed a way of painting that felt both ancient and deeply rooted in the anxieties of the twentieth century.

    The Night (1919)

    The Iron Bridge (View of Frankfurt) (1922)

    Self-Portrait with Horn (1938)

    The Night (1919)

    The Weimar Republic and New Objectivity

    During the 1920s, Beckmann found himself moving through a Germany that was struggling to find its footing. He became associated with the New Objectivity movement, a style that moved away from the inward-looking emotions of earlier years toward a more direct, often biting, look at reality. His work from this period captured the doomed nature of the Weimar Republic with a sense of acidic cynicism. He did not shy away from the chaos of the era, instead using his brush to document the tension of a society in transition.

    Even when his subjects appeared light or festive, such as circus performers or social gatherings, an undercurrent of moodiness or unease often remained beneath the surface. There was a persistent sense of discomfort in his compositions. This tension was particularly evident in his graphic work. He produced several black-and-white print portfolios during these years, including the work titled Hell, which utilized the raw power of printmaking to explore the darker aspects of the human condition.

    The Night (1919)

    The Iron Bridge (View of Frankfurt) (1922)

    Rugby players (1929)

    Exile in Amsterdam and the Nazi Regime

    The political climate in Germany grew increasingly hostile toward Beckmann’s vision. In 1933, the rise of the Nazi regime brought direct consequences to his professional life when he was dismissed from his teaching position at the Stadel Art School in Frankfurt. His work was targeted by the authorities and included in the Degenerate Art exhibition, a move that signaled the impossibility of remaining in his homeland. Facing this mounting pressure and the threat of the regime, he chose to leave Germany behind.

    Beckmann spent ten years in self-imposed exile in Amsterdam. This period was marked by the profound uncertainty of living through the Second World War. While in Amsterdam, his paintings often turned toward mythic and parabolic images, moving away from the specific realities of the world he had left behind. His art during these years reflected a sense of being unmoored from a particular time or place, focusing instead on the internal struggles of the human condition.

    Departure (1933–35)

    Life and Work in America

    After years of living in exile in Amsterdam, Max Beckmann finally immigrated to America in 1947. His arrival marked a new chapter of stability, though his focus remained deeply tied to the act of creation and the sharing of his craft. He spent his first two years in the United States living in St. Louis, Missouri, where he became an active part of the local artistic community. During this time, he shared his knowledge through teaching positions at Washington University in St. Louis and the Brooklyn Museum.

    The final years of his life were spent in New York, where he moved in 1949. This period was brief, lasting only until his death in 1950. Even in these concluding months, his work continued to reflect the personal and psychological depth that had characterized his entire career. His presence in the American art scene was marked by a refusal to simplify his complex visual language, even as he settled into a new home far from his German roots.

    Self-Portrait in Blue Jacket (1950)

    Notable and Key Artworks

    Beckmann’s canvases often felt like crowded, claustrophobic rooms where the tension of the era was physically palpable. In 1919, he produced The Night, a work that captures the fragmentation of modern life through distorted figures and a sense of profound alienation. This piece reflects the societal trauma left in the wake of the Great War, using a heavy, psychological approach to depict the chaos of the post-war period. His ability to translate internal anxiety into a visual language became a defining feature of his output.

    As the industrial landscape of Germany shifted, so did his focus. His 1922 painting, The Iron Bridge (View of Frankfurt), uses thick, gestural brushstrokes to depict a city in transition. The composition is anchored by the heavy, geometric silhouette of the suspension bridge, cutting through a palette of saturated earth tones and industrial grays. It captures the pulsating energy of an urban environment caught between the old world and a rapidly modernizing future.

    Throughout his life, Beckmann returned to his own image, using his own face to explore the human condition. His 1938 work, Self-Portrait with Horn, shows him navigating a world of increasing uncertainty. Even in his final years, his work remained deeply personal. His Self-Portrait in Blue Jacket, painted in 1950, remains a significant part of his late period, reflecting the man he had become after his time in exile and his move to America.

    Great Scene of Agony (1906)

    Self-Portrait in Florence (1907)

    Self-Portrait with a Bucket Hat (about 1921)

    The Old Actress (1926)

    Self-Portrait in tuxedo (1927)

    Legacy and Historical Impact

    Max Beckmann remains a central figure in the history of 20th-century painting. While he often resisted the labels placed upon him, his work is widely considered a cornerstone of the German Expressionism movement. He possessed a singular ability to translate the fractured psyche of a continent into a visual language that felt both deeply personal and universally understood. His paintings do not merely depict scenes; they carry an extraordinary psychological depth that forces a confrontation with the human condition.

    His influence extended far beyond the borders of Germany. Even as he navigated the difficult years of exile in Amsterdam and his eventual move to the United States, his voice remained distinct. He managed to bridge the gap between traditional academic training and the radical shifts of modernism. By refusing to settle into a single movement, he carved out a space that was entirely his own, characterized by a tension between the physical world and the internal, often troubled, landscape of the mind.

    The Night (1919)

    The Iron Bridge (View of Frankfurt) (1922)

    Self-Portrait with Horn (1938)

    The Prodigal Son (1949)

    Where to See His Works Today

    Finding the physical traces of Beckmann's life requires traveling through the cities that shaped his exile and his later years. In Germany, the Kunstsammlung Nordrhein-Westfalen in Duesseldorf maintains a significant presence of his work, holding pieces like The Night from 1919. His presence in Europe is also felt in Zurich, where the Kunsthaus Zürich preserves his imagery. These collections offer a way to see how his vision shifted as he moved through the complexities of the early twentieth century.

    For those following his path to the United States, his later life is documented in American institutions. The Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York holds works from his final years, including his 1950 Self-Portrait in Blue Jacket. The Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) also maintains his works within its permanent collection. These pieces reflect the final chapter of a man who spent his last years navigating the streets of New York.

    The Night (1919)

    Self-Portrait in Blue Jacket (1950)

    Seascape with poplars (1924)

    The Iron Bridge (View of Frankfurt) (1922)

    Kur skaityti daugiau

    Peržiūrėkite tai savo sienoje: Bird's hell by Max Beckmann kaip rankiniu būdu ant lino drobės surestų aliejus, pritaikytas jūsų erdvei

    Raskite internete

    QR kodas, vedantis į Bird's hell atsisiuntimo puslapį

    artsdot.com/lt/art/download/max-beckmann-bird-s-hell-8XYK2S-en/

    Citavimo šio kūrinio duomenys

    MLA
    Beckmann, Max. Bird's hell. 1938, https://artsdot.com/lt/art/max-beckmann-bird-s-hell-8XYK2S-en/
    APA
    Beckmann, Max (1938). Bird's hell [Painting]. https://artsdot.com/lt/art/max-beckmann-bird-s-hell-8XYK2S-en/
    Chicago
    Max Beckmann. Bird's hell. 1938. https://artsdot.com/lt/art/max-beckmann-bird-s-hell-8XYK2S-en/
    Harvard
    Beckmann, Max (1938) Bird's hell. Available at: https://artsdot.com/lt/art/max-beckmann-bird-s-hell-8XYK2S-en/

    Atidžiai pastebėkite

    Bird's hell — Max Beckmann

    Atidžusiai pastebėkite

    Atsakykite savo žodžiais. Čia nėra neteisingų atsakymų – yra tik atsakymai, kuriuos galite paaiškinti.

    1. Kas pirmiausia patraukia jūsų dėmesį ir kodėl?
    2. Kokie spalvos ar formos sukuria nuotaiką — ir kokia tai nuotaika?
    3. Mūsų kataloge šis kūrinys priskirtas prie: surrealism, crowd scene, birds. Ar sutinkate? Ką pridėtumėte arba pašalintumėte?
    4. Prisiminkite Naktis (Platė 7) iš Šalo (1919), apie kurią buvo rašyta anksčiau šiame vadove. Įvardinkite dvi bendras detales su šiuo kūriniu ir vieną skirtumą.
    5. Surrealism: Dream logic painted with waking precision: impossible things shown as if they were ordinary. Kur tai galima pastebėti šiame darbe?

    Jūsų atsakymas

    Parašykite trumpą pastraipę apie šį kūrinį. Naudokite informaciją iš ankstesnių šio vadovėjo dalių bei savo anksčiau pateiktus atsakymus.

    Karo testas

    Bird's hell — Max Beckmann

    Kiek gerai pažįstate šį kūrinį?

    Pasirinkite po vieną atsakymą į kiekvieną iš šių 5 klausimų. Kiekvienas iš jų turi tik vieną teisingą atsakymą.

    1. 1. What artistic movement is best associated with the depiction of chaos and surreal elements in 'Bird's hell'?

      • A Impressionism
      • B Surrealism
      • C Neoclassicism
    2. 2. Which artist is credited with creating the painting 'Bird's hell'?

      • A Pablo Picasso
      • B Salvador Dalí
      • C Max Beckmann
    3. 3. The description notes that the room in 'Bird's hell' is filled with various objects. Which of these items was mentioned as being present?

      • A Musical instruments
      • B Bowls, cups, bottles, and vases
      • C Sculptural busts
    4. 4. Max Beckmann's artistic style was influenced by which historical art forms, according to the biography?

      • A Baroque portraiture and Rococo ornamentation
      • B Medieval stained glass and Northern European artists
      • C Cubist fragmentation and Futurism
    5. 5. What sense of atmosphere does the combination of many people, birds, and scattered objects create in 'Bird's hell'?

      • A Tranquility and order
      • B Serenity and balance
      • C Chaos and disorder

    Mano rezultatas: ____ iš 5

    Atsakymai – mokytojui

    Ši dalis spausdinama atskiram puslapyje, todėl kopijuojant jos nereikia įtraukti.

    1A · 2B · 3A · 4A · 5B

    Patikrinkite kiekvieną atsakymą su šio paveikslėlio katalogo informacija

    Klausimai ir atsakymai

    Kas sukūrė „Bird's hell“ ir kokiais metais?

    „Bird's hell“ autorius yra Max Beckmann, o kūrinys datuojamas 1938 m.

    Kaip „Bird's hell“ spalvos dera vienas su kitu?

    „Bird's hell“ – Max Beckmann spalvos于demonstruoja Discordant Palette harmoniją. Harmonija apibūdina, kaip spalvos dera viena su kita.

    Kokią emociją perteikia „Bird's hell“ – Max Beckmann?

    Emocinis tonas, nurodytas kūriniui „Bird's hell“ – Max Beckmann, yra Tense. Jis apibūdina jausmą, kurį išreiškia šis darbas.