Paper

Student Artwork Guide

second version of triptych 3

Name Class Date

Francis Bacon, second version of triptych 3 (1944). Reproduced for reference; rights reserved by the rights holder.

The facts

Artist
Francis Bacon artsdot.com/en/artists/francis-bacon/
Artist’s dates
1909 – 1992
Painted
1944
Medium
Acrylic On Canvas
Movement
Expressionist Surrealism
Artistic style
Surrealist
Influences
Cubism
Notable elements or techniques
Distorted figures, Vibrant red hues
Subject or theme
Animal Anatomy

In context

second version of triptych 3 — Francis Bacon

When was this painted?

  1. 1900
  2. 1910
  3. 1920
  4. 1930
  5. 1940
  6. 1950
  7. 1960
  8. 1970
  9. 1980
  10. 1990

Shaded: the lifetime of Francis Bacon (1909–1992) ▲ this work, 1944

Compare with

Pick one work above: name two things it shares with this one, and one thing that's different.

More works to set beside this one: artsdot.com/en/art/similar/francis-bacon-second-version-of-triptych-3-6E3SWZ-en/

Colours

Measured from the image

    Main colour

    Walnut #70190b

    Catalogued palette

    • #70190B
    • #2C0E08
    • #C6A999
    • #775B4B
    Palette
    Dark The dominant colour family in the image.
    Main colour name
    Walnut
    Intensity
    Balanced How saturated and varied the colours are, from a single toned-down hue to many bright ones.
    Contrast
    Serene How much the colours differ in lightness and saturation across the picture.
    Harmony
    Unified Palette How well the colours work together, from clashing to fully unified.
    Brightness
    Deep_shadow How light or dark the picture reads overall, from deep shadow to bright highlight.
    Saturation
    Clear Color Presence How pure and strong the colours are, from near-grey to fully vivid.

    About this artwork

    second version of triptych 3 — Francis Bacon

    A Descent into Anxiety: Examining Bacon’s ‘Second Version of Triptych 1944’

    Francis Bacon's 'Second Version of Triptych,' completed in 1988, stands as a haunting testament to the artist’s unwavering exploration of psychological torment and existential dread. This monumental oil painting—a reworking of his earlier masterpiece—captures a visceral confrontation with fear and vulnerability, cementing Bacon’s reputation as one of the most influential figures in postwar British art. The artwork itself depicts a disconcerting tableau: three canvases interwoven to create a single image featuring a grotesque canine figure sprawled across what appears to be a brick wall or tabletop surface. Its gaping maw is open wide, conveying an unsettling blend of yawn and desperate vocalization—a gesture simultaneously comical and profoundly disturbing.

    The dominant hue is a searing crimson, applied with thick impasto strokes that lend the painting a palpable physicality. This bold color choice isn’t merely decorative; it serves as a conduit for emotional intensity, mirroring the turbulent inner landscape of Bacon's artistic vision. Contrasting sharply against this fiery backdrop are stark black lines delineating the dog’s form—a deliberate simplification that amplifies its grotesque presence and underscores its isolation within the composition. The artist eschewed traditional representational methods, favoring instead a style rooted in Expressionism, mirroring the anxieties prevalent during the period following World War II. Bacon's technique involved layering paint onto canvas with aggressive brushstrokes, creating textured surfaces that seem to pulsate with suppressed emotion.

    Delving deeper into the historical context reveals Bacon’s engagement with the pervasive atmosphere of uncertainty and disillusionment that characterized Europe after the devastation of the Second World War. Influenced by Surrealist ideas—particularly those championed by André Breton—Bacon sought to depict not merely what he saw but what he felt, channeling his own psychological struggles into artistic expression. The triptych format itself is significant, referencing religious iconography and suggesting a deliberate attempt to grapple with profound spiritual questions. However, Bacon’s intention wasn't pious contemplation; rather, it was an unflinching portrayal of human suffering—a refusal to sugarcoat the darker aspects of existence.

    Symbolically, the dog embodies vulnerability and primal instinct – qualities that resonate deeply within the artwork’s emotional core. Its open mouth symbolizes both exhaustion and a desperate yearning for connection, highlighting the inescapable loneliness inherent in confronting existential anxieties. The brick wall or tabletop surface serves as a barrier—a physical manifestation of psychological defenses against overwhelming emotion. Bacon's masterful manipulation of color and line compels viewers to confront uncomfortable truths about themselves and the human condition.

    Ultimately, ‘Second Version of Triptych’ transcends mere visual representation; it is an immersive experience designed to provoke contemplation and elicit visceral responses. It remains a cornerstone of Bacon’s oeuvre—a powerful reminder that art can serve as a conduit for confronting our deepest fears and grappling with the complexities of human emotion. Its enduring appeal lies in its uncompromising honesty and its ability to capture the unsettling beauty of psychological turmoil.

    Artist and museum

    Artist

    Francis Bacon

    Born in Dublin, Ireland

    A Life Immersed in the Visceral

    Francis Bacon, a name synonymous with the rawest emotionality in 20th-century art, was born in Dublin, Ireland, in 1909, yet his artistic spirit found its truest expression within the turbulent landscape of post-war Britain. His early life was far from stable; frequent relocations due to his mother’s health instilled a sense of displacement that would profoundly shape his worldview and, ultimately, permeate his canvases. A complex relationship with his stern father and a close bond with his nanny, Jessie Lightfoot, further colored the emotional terrain of his formative years. Initially drawn to horse racing and a life of gambling, Bacon drifted through various occupations before finally dedicating himself to painting in his late twenties – a delayed start that perhaps intensified the urgency and intensity of his later work. He wasn’t formally trained, instead forging his own path, absorbing influences from diverse sources, and developing a uniquely unsettling visual language.

    The Crucible of Early Influences

    Bacon's artistic awakening was not immediate but rather a gradual accumulation of impressions. The works of Pablo Picasso, particularly the distorted figures of his early Cubist period, proved pivotal in liberating him from traditional representation. He found further inspiration in the haunting photography of Egon Schiele, whose expressive distortions of the human form resonated with Bacon’s own burgeoning fascination with the fragility and vulnerability of existence. However, it was a chance encounter with Sergei Eisenstein's film Battleship Potemkin that provided a crucial catalyst. The film’s visceral imagery, particularly a close-up of a screaming face, became an enduring motif in Bacon’s work, representing primal terror and the depths of human suffering. He also deeply admired the Old Masters, notably Diego Velázquez, whose Portrait of Pope Innocent X he would famously reinterpret throughout his career, transforming the authoritative papal figure into a tormented specter. These influences weren't merely stylistic appropriations; they were absorbed and transmuted through Bacon’s own unique sensibility, resulting in an artistic vision that was both deeply personal and universally resonant.

    Forging a Signature Style: Distortion and Isolation

    Bacon’s breakthrough arrived with *Three Studies for Figures at the Base of a Crucifixion* (1944), a work that shocked and captivated audiences in post-war London. This triptych established his signature style – distorted, fragmented figures isolated within claustrophobic spaces. These weren't depictions of religious martyrdom but rather visceral explorations of human anguish, stripped bare of any comforting narrative or spiritual solace. His paintings often feature blurred or dissolving forms, conveying a sense of psychological turmoil and physical vulnerability. He frequently employed geometric structures—cages, boxes—to confine his subjects, emphasizing their isolation and powerlessness. Bacon’s palette was typically muted and somber, reflecting the dark themes he explored, though punctuated by bursts of intense color that heightened the emotional impact. The use of these cages wasn't merely a compositional device; it symbolized the inherent limitations and constraints imposed upon human existence. He sought to capture not just what things looked like but how they felt, translating inner states of anxiety, fear, and despair onto the canvas with brutal honesty.

    Themes of Mortality, Anguish, and the Human Condition

    Throughout his prolific career, Bacon repeatedly returned to certain motifs: the crucifixion as a symbol of suffering; portraits that delved into the psychological intensity of his subjects, often friends and lovers like George Dyer; and self-portraits that served as introspective explorations of identity and mortality. His Study After Velázquez’s Portrait of Pope Innocent X (1953) series is perhaps one of his most iconic achievements, transforming Velázquez's dignified portrait into a screaming apparition, embodying existential dread. The portraits of George Dyer, his volatile lover, are particularly poignant, capturing both the intensity of their connection and the looming shadow of tragedy. Bacon’s work wasn’t about depicting specific individuals; it was about exploring universal themes of human vulnerability, isolation, and the inevitability of death. He didn't shy away from the darker aspects of existence but rather confronted them head-on, forcing viewers to confront their own mortality and anxieties.

    A Lasting Legacy: Challenging Conventions

    Francis Bacon’s impact on 20th-century art is undeniable. He challenged traditional notions of representation, rejecting idealized beauty in favor of a raw, unflinching portrayal of the human condition. His work profoundly influenced generations of artists, paving the way for new forms of expression and challenging conventional artistic boundaries.

    Post-War Expressionism: Bacon is considered a key figure in this movement, influencing artists with his bold style and psychological depth.

    Auction Records & Museum Exhibitions: His paintings continue to command high prices at auction and are exhibited in major museums worldwide, solidifying his place in art history.

    Confronting Truths: Bacon’s legacy lies in his ability to confront uncomfortable truths about human existence and translate those experiences into powerful and unforgettable images.

    Despite a turbulent personal life marked by gambling, drinking, and complex relationships, he remained dedicated to his art until his death in 1992. He left behind a body of work that continues to resonate with audiences today, reminding us of the fragility of existence and the enduring power of art to confront the darkest corners of the human soul. His paintings are not merely images; they are visceral experiences—a testament to the enduring power of art to provoke, disturb, and ultimately, illuminate the complexities of being human.

    Where to read more

    Find this online

    QR code linking to the download page for second version of triptych 3

    artsdot.com/en/art/download/francis-bacon-second-version-of-triptych-3-6E3SWZ-en/

    Cite this artwork

    MLA
    Bacon, Francis. second version of triptych 3. 1944, https://artsdot.com/en/art/francis-bacon-second-version-of-triptych-3-6E3SWZ-en/
    APA
    Bacon, Francis (1944). second version of triptych 3 [Painting]. https://artsdot.com/en/art/francis-bacon-second-version-of-triptych-3-6E3SWZ-en/
    Chicago
    Francis Bacon. second version of triptych 3. 1944. https://artsdot.com/en/art/francis-bacon-second-version-of-triptych-3-6E3SWZ-en/
    Harvard
    Bacon, Francis (1944) second version of triptych 3. Available at: https://artsdot.com/en/art/francis-bacon-second-version-of-triptych-3-6E3SWZ-en/

    Look closely

    second version of triptych 3 — Francis Bacon

    Look closely

    Answer in your own words. There are no wrong answers here — only answers you can explain.

    1. What catches your eye first, and why?
    2. Which colours or shapes create the mood — and what is that mood?
    3. Our catalogue files this work under: distorted figure, psychological anxiety, animal imagery. Do you agree? What would you add, or take away?
    4. Look back at Three Studies for Figures at the Base of a Crucifixion (1944), earlier in this guide. Name two things it shares with this work, and one that is different.
    5. Francis Bacon was about 35 when this was made. What in it looks like the work of an artist at that stage?

    Your response

    Write a short paragraph about this artwork. Use the facts from the earlier parts of this guide, and your answers above.

    Art quiz

    second version of triptych 3 — Francis Bacon

    How well do you know this artwork?

    Tick one answer for each of the 5 questions below. Each has exactly one correct answer.

    1. 1. What artistic style is predominantly employed in ‘Second Version of Triptych’?

      • A Realism
      • B Impressionism
      • C Expressionism
    2. 2. The painting depicts a dog. What color dominates the background?

      • A Blue
      • B Green
      • C Red
    3. 3. 'Second Version of Triptych' was created in which year?

      • A 1920
      • B 1944
      • C 1968
    4. 4. According to the description, what is notable about the dog’s posture?

      • A It's sitting calmly.
      • B It appears to be falling off.
      • C It’s gazing intently at the viewer.
    5. 5. What emotion does the painting aim to convey?

      • A Joy
      • B Peace
      • C Anxiety

    My score: ____ out of 5

    Answer key — for the teacher

    This starts a fresh printed page, so it can simply be left out of the copies.

    1C · 2C · 3B · 4B · 5C