Kort fortalt
Hvis du kjenner til ett maleri av John Dee, er det sannsynligvis Obsidian Mirror (1400). Four Castles Gold Disk (1560) og Sigillum Dei, Wax Disks (1582) utgjør de tre verkene folk kjenner igjen umiddelbart. Vår katalog inneholder 4 verk av John Dee. Nedenfor finner du de 4 mest kjente, hver med årstall, hvor de befinner seg og hva som gjør dem spesielle.
Start her: de 10 beste maleriene av John Dee
John Dee år for år: de fremste verkene
John Dee sine daterte verk her strekker seg over 23 år, fra 1560 til 1582. Bla gjennom dem år for år, med de mest kjente verkene fra hvert år.
Verk per år
Velg et år for å se verkene fra det året.
Dine spørsmål om John Dees malerier
Hvilket maleri av John Dee er det mest kjente?Se svaret
Øverst på listen står Obsidian Mirror (1400). Rett bak følger Four Castles Gold Disk (1560) og Sigillum Dei, Wax Disks (1582).
Hvor mange malerier har John Dee skapt?Se svaret
Vi har 4 verk av John Dee i vår katalog, datert fra 1560 til 1582.
Når malte John Dee sine mest kjente verk?Se svaret
I 1582, mer enn på noe annet tidspunkt: 2 av de 4 verkene på denne siden stammer fra den tiden, Sigillum Dei, Wax Disks av dem.
Hvilke berømte malerier av John Dee kom først og sist?Se svaret
Det eldste verket her er Four Castles Gold Disk (1560); det nyeste er Sigillum Dei, Wax Disks (1582).
Kan jeg få en reproduksjon av et maleri av John Dee?Se svaret
Ja. Alle malerier på denne siden er tilgjengelige som håndmalte oljereproduksjoner eller trykk, i den størrelsen som passer deg. Åpne maleriets side for å bestille.
Bli kjent med John Dee
The Life and Family of John Dee
John Dee was an English polymath and occultist, a man whose intellectual reach extended far beyond the boundaries of traditional scholarship. Born on 13 July 1527, he occupied a space between rigorous science and the esoteric. His lineage began with his father, Rowland Dee, providing the foundation for a life defined by the pursuit of hidden knowledge. He was not a painter or a visual creator, but a thinker whose influence was felt through his vast intellectual inquiries and his involvement in the occult sciences of the sixteenth century.
Family life for Dee was marked by specific, documented connections that anchored his complex existence. His son, Arthur Dee, was born on 13 July 1579. This lineage continued through a life spent largely in Mortlake, London, where he maintained his residence and his extensive collections. The weight of his intellectual pursuits often intersected with his personal associations, creating a life that was as much about human relationships as it was about the study of the unknown.
The end of his life remains a matter of slight historical debate, with records suggesting he died in 1608 or 1609. Regardless of the exact year, the impact of his work remains a concrete part of the history of English intellectualism. He left behind a legacy of manuscripts and tracts, including the Cotton Vitellius C. VII, which serves as a primary record of his own life and thoughts. His existence was defined by this tension between the documented word and the unseen forces he sought to understand.
Travels and Connections in Europe
John Dee was an English polymath and occultist whose influence relied heavily on his ability to navigate the complex social and intellectual circles of the European continent. His movements were not mere sightseeing; they were strategic engagements with the power structures of the era. He was a visitor to the court of Rudolf II, a connection that placed him at the center of significant intellectual exchange. This relationship was solidified during his time in Prague, where he visited the court of Rudolf II between 1584 and 1585. These interactions demonstrate a man deeply embedded in the high-stakes political and esoteric currents of the late sixteenth century.
His social network was as diverse as it was specialized. He maintained a close friendship with Edward Kelley, a relationship that likely defined much of his later intellectual pursuits. Beyond these personal ties, Dee moved through a web of associates and acquaintances that spanned various social strata. He was connected to William of Rosenberg and Nicholas Starkie, figures who represent the breadth of his professional and social reach. These were not casual acquaintances but part of a structured existence defined by proximity to power and the exchange of specialized knowledge. His presence in Prague and his ties to the court of Rudolf II confirm that his work was never isolated to a single locale, but was instead part of a broader, continental dialogue.
