Paper

Student Artwork Guide

Tulsa 3

Name Class Date

larry clark, Tulsa 3 (1963). Reproduced for reference; rights reserved by the rights holder.

The facts

Artist
larry clark artsdot.com/en/artists/larry-clark/
Artist’s dates
1943 – ?
Painted
1963
Original size
20 x 28 cm

In context

Tulsa 3 — larry clark

How big is it?

The original measures 20 × 28 cm (height × width), drawn here beside an adult of average height.

When was this painted?

  1. 1940
  2. 1950
  3. 1960

Shaded: the lifetime of larry clark (1943–?) ▲ this work, 1963

Compare with

Pick one work above: name two things it shares with this one, and one thing that's different.

More works to set beside this one: artsdot.com/en/art/similar/larry-clark-tulsa-3-AQTW5R-en/

Colours

Measured from the image

    Main colour

    Celadon #b4b3b3

    Catalogued palette

    • #B4B3B3
    • #222223
    • #4D4D4D
    • #848484
    Main colour name
    Celadon
    Intensity
    Monochromatic How saturated and varied the colours are, from a single toned-down hue to many bright ones.
    Contrast
    Statement How much the colours differ in lightness and saturation across the picture.
    Harmony
    Discordant Palette How well the colours work together, from clashing to fully unified.
    Brightness
    Balanced How light or dark the picture reads overall, from deep shadow to bright highlight.
    Saturation
    Muted How pure and strong the colours are, from near-grey to fully vivid.

    Artist and museum

    Artist

    larry clark

    The Raw Lens of Reality: The Life and Vision of Larry Clark

    To look through the lens of Larry Clark is to confront the unvarnished, often uncomfortable truths of American adolescence. Born in Tulsa, Oklahoma, in 1943, Clark’s artistic journey began not in a formal studio, but within the intimate, gritty confines of his own upbringing. As the son of an itinerant baby photographer, he was immersed in the mechanics of the camera from a young age, yet his true subject matter would eventually drift far from the sanitized innocence of portraiture. Instead, Clark turned his gaze toward the fringes of suburban life, capturing the turbulent, often shadowed existence of youth culture during the late 1960s and early 1970s. His work serves as a visceral bridge between the quiet desperation of the American heartland and the explosive, rebellious energy of the counterculture movement.

    The foundation of Clark’s legendary status was laid in his seminal photographic series, Tulsa. Published in 1971, this collection of black-and-white imagery acted as a profound sociological document, stripping away the myth of suburban perfection to reveal a landscape of drug use, sexual exploration, and profound alienation. Through these photographs, Clark did not merely observe; he participated, documenting the lives of his own circle of friends with a level of intimacy that felt both voyeuristic and deeply empathetic. His technique relied on a stark realism, utilizing dramatic lighting and candid, unposed compositions to evoke a sense of palpable melancholy and raw vulnerability. By focusing on the textures of skin, the shadows of back alleys, and the fleeting expressions of disillusionment, he transformed documentary photography into a psychological exploration of the human condition.

    Cinematic Provocation and the Legacy of Subculture

    As his career evolved, Clark transitioned from the still image to the moving picture, bringing his unflinching aesthetic to the realm of film. His directorial debut, the 1995 film Kids, became a cultural lightning rod, sparking intense national debate regarding artistic freedom and the depiction of societal decay. Much like his photography, the film utilized an uncompromisingly honest approach to tackle themes of drug addiction, sexuality, and the loss of innocence among teenagers. This ability to navigate the boundaries of controversy allowed Clark to cement his role as a provocateur, a storyteller who refused to look away from the darker impulses of the youth subcultures he inhabited—from the gritty streets of New York to the sun-drenched, yet equally rebellious, worlds of surfing and skateboarding.

    The historical significance of Larry Clark’s body of work lies in its ability to shatter long-held American myths. He challenged the notion that violence and drug use were exclusively urban phenomena, instead presenting them as pervasive elements of the suburban experience. His later works, such as Teenage Lust, continued this trajectory, weaving together personal history and collective memory through a tapestry of graphic and emotive imagery. Through his multifaceted career as a photographer, director, and writer, Clark has left an indelible mark on contemporary art, reminding us that true beauty often resides in the most unsettling moments of our shared reality. His legacy remains a powerful testament to the importance of the witness, capturing the fleeting, often painful transition from childhood to the complexities of adulthood.

    Where to read more

    Find this online

    QR code linking to the download page for Tulsa 3

    artsdot.com/en/art/download/larry-clark-tulsa-3-AQTW5R-en/

    Cite this artwork

    MLA
    clark, larry. Tulsa 3. 1963, https://artsdot.com/en/art/larry-clark-tulsa-3-AQTW5R-en/
    APA
    clark, larry (1963). Tulsa 3 [Painting]. https://artsdot.com/en/art/larry-clark-tulsa-3-AQTW5R-en/
    Chicago
    larry clark. Tulsa 3. 1963. https://artsdot.com/en/art/larry-clark-tulsa-3-AQTW5R-en/
    Harvard
    clark, larry (1963) Tulsa 3. Available at: https://artsdot.com/en/art/larry-clark-tulsa-3-AQTW5R-en/

    Look closely

    Tulsa 3 — larry clark

    Look closely

    Answer in your own words. There are no wrong answers here — only answers you can explain.

    1. What catches your eye first, and why?
    2. Which colours or shapes create the mood — and what is that mood?
    3. Look back at Tulsa 42 (1971), earlier in this guide. Name two things it shares with this work, and one that is different.
    4. larry clark was about 20 when this was made. What in it looks like the work of an artist at that stage?
    5. What might the artist have wanted you to feel?

    Your response

    Write a short paragraph about this artwork. Use the facts from the earlier parts of this guide, and your answers above.