Papirformat

Guide til elevkunst

Supper in Dresden

Navn Klasse Dato

Georg Baselitz, Supper in Dresden (1983), Kunsthaus Zürich. Reproduceret til referenceformål; alle rettigheder er forbeholdt rettighedshaveren.

Fakta om værket

Kunstner
Georg Baselitz artsdot.com/da/artists/georg-baselitz/
Kunstnerens levetid
1938 – ?
Malet
1983
Medie
Oil On Canvas
Oprindelig størrelse
280 x 450 cm
Bevægelse
Neo-Expressionism A rough, urgent return to figure painting in the 1980s, after years of cool abstraction.
Periode
Contemporary
Afholdt hos
Kunsthaus Zürich artsdot.com/da/museums/kunsthaus-zurich-zurich_da/
Artistic style
Figurative/Abstract oscillation
Influences
Die Brücke artists, Last Supper motif
Notable elements or techniques
Inverted figures, robust chromatic harmonies
Subject or theme
Die Brücke meeting; historical reflection

I kontekst

Supper in Dresden — Georg Baselitz

Hvor stor er den?

Originalen måler 280 × 450 cm (højde × bredde), vist her ved siden af en voksen person af gennemsnitlig højde. Det er for stort til at kunne gengives i målestoksforhold på denne side.

Hvornår er dette malet?

  1. 1930
  2. 1940
  3. 1950
  4. 1960
  5. 1970
  6. 1980

Skyggelagt: Georg Baselitz' livstid (1938–?) ▲ dette værk, 1983

Sammenlignelige værker

Vælg et af de ovenstående værker: nævn to ting, det har til fælles med dette, og én ting, der er forskellig.

Flere værker, der kan placeres ved siden af dette: artsdot.com/da/art/similar/georg-baselitz-supper-in-dresden-D3XNP8-en/

Farver

Målt ud fra billedet

    Hovedfarve

    Phthalo Green #152630

    Gemt palet

    • #152630
    • #417BB3
    • #8F675B
    • #CA9A9D
    Primær farve
    Phthalo Green
    Intensitet
    Balanced Hvor mættede og varierede farverne er, fra en enkelt dæmpet nuance til mange klare nuancer.
    Kontrast
    Statement Hvor meget farverne varierer i lysstyrke og mætning på tværs af billedet.
    Harmoni
    Discordant Palette Hvor godt farverne spiller sammen, fra modstridende til fuldstændig harmoniske.
    Lysstyrke
    Balanced Hvor lyst eller mørkt billedet fremstår samlet set, fra dybe skygger til lyse højlys.
    Mætning
    Balanced Soft Hvor rene og stærke farverne er, fra næsten grå til fuldt livlige.

    Om dette kunstværk

    Supper in Dresden — Georg Baselitz

    A Masterpiece of Inversion: Reimagining History in Baselitz's Supper in Dresden

    In the vast, commanding expanse of Supper in Dresden, viewers are invited into a world where reality is turned on its head—quite literally. This monumental oil on canvas, stretching over four meters in length, serves as a profound testament to the genius of Georg Baselitz, one of the most provocative voices of the Neo-Expressionist movement. At first glance, the painting presents a chaotic, almost feverish gathering around a long dining table, yet beneath this surface of disundress lies a deeply layered exploration of identity and artistic heritage. The composition oscillates between recognizable figuration and robust, chromatic harmonies, where striking shades of pink, blue, and black collide to create a sense of restless energy that captures the eye and refuses to let go.

    The technique employed by Baselitz in this 1983 masterpiece is nothing short of revolutionary. By famously inverting his subjects, he de-emphasizes the literal content of the scene to bring the raw materiality of painting—the brushstroke, the texture, and the color—to the forefront. This deliberate subversion forces the viewer to look past the "what" of the image and instead experience the "how." The central figure, with eyes and mouth agapped in a silent, haunting cry, dominates the canvas, acting as an emotional anchor amidst the surrounding figures who seem to drift toward the edges of the frame. This tension between the central focus and the peripheral movement creates a psychological depth that makes the work feel alive, breathing with a nervous, almost agonized vitality.

    Historical Echoes and Symbolic Depth

    Beyond its striking visual impact, Supper in Dresden is steeped in historical symbolism and personal reflection. While the motif of a shared meal evokes the sacred tradition of the Last Supper, Baselitz uses this framework to pay homage to the birth of German Expressionism. The painting serves as a spectral gathering of the Die Brücke group; specifically, it depicts the meeting of Expressionists in 1905 that gave rise to this influential artistic movement. Within this chaotic feast, one can identify the nervous, agonized-looking figure on the left as Ernst Ludwig Kirchner, while the dominant central figure is said to represent Karl Schmidt-Rotluff. In a surreal twist of form, the two close friends Otto Müller and Erich Heckel appear on the right, sharing a single body.

    This layering of history allows the painting to function as both a personal memoir and a cultural monument. For collectors and enthusiasts, the work offers more than just visual spectacle; it provides a window into the fractured order of a post-war society. Baselitz, who grew up amidst the literal and metaphorical rubble of World War II, uses this inversion to mirror a world that had been turned upside down by conflict. The painting captures the very essence of reconstruction—the attempt to find meaning and form in the midst of displacement and destruction.

    An Essential Addition for Discerning Spaces

    For interior designers and art collectors seeking to anchor a room with intellectual weight and dramatic flair, Supper in Dresden offers unparalleled presence. Its massive scale and bold, contrasting palette make it an ideal centerpiece for grand galleries, sophisticated lofts, or contemporary executive suites. The work does not merely decorate a wall; it commands the atmosphere of a space, inviting conversation and deep contemplation.

    Whether you are drawn to the raw, expressive power of the Neo-Expressionist movement or the complex historical narratives woven into every brushstroke, a high-quality reproduction of this masterpiece brings a sense of prestige and profound emotion to any environment. It is an investment in a piece of art history that continues to challenge our perceptions of reality, making it a timeless choice for those who appreciate art that is as intellectually stimulating as it is visually breathtaking.

    Kunstner og museum

    Kunstner

    Georg Baselitz

    A Life Forged in the Shadows of History

    Born Hans-Georg Bruno Kern on January 23, 1938, in the small German village of Deutschbaselitz, the artist who would become known to the world as Georg Baselitz was a child of profound transition and upheaval. Growing up in the Upper Lusatia region amidst the literal and metaphorical rubble of World War II, his early consciousness was inextricably linked to themes of destruction, displacement, and the fractured order of a shattered society. This formative environment—marked by the loss of community and the lingering trauma of occupation—became the bedrock of his artistic vision. The devastation he witnessed did not merely provide subject matter; it instilled in him an urgent, lifelong need to question established conventions and to explore the very nature of perception through the lens of a world that had been turned upside down.

    His early artistic inclinations were nurtured by a deep intellectual curiosity and significant cultural encounters. The influence of his father, an elementary school teacher, fostered a disciplined approach to observation, while the profound writings of Jakob Böhme provided a spiritual and philosophical complexity to his worldview. A pivotal moment in his development occurred when he encountered Louis-Ferdinand von Rayski’s Wermsdorfer Wald at a local school assembly. This masterpiece of realism ignited a fascination with capturing visual truth, leading him to produce portraits, religious subjects, and landscapes that, even in his youth, hinted at a more futuristic and unsettling vision.

    The Revolution of Inversion and Neo-Expressionism

    As the art world moved toward the sterile intellectualism of Minimalism and Conceptual Art in the 1960s, Baselitz staged a visceral rebellion. He became a leading voice of Neo-Expressionism, a movement that sought to reclaim the raw power and emotional intensity of figurative painting. However, his contribution was far from a simple return to tradition. In 1969, Baselitz introduced one of the most radical innovations in modern art: the technique of painting his subjects upside down. This deliberate inversion was not a mere gimmick; it was a profound attempt to strip the subject of its representational, content-driven character. By turning the figure on its head, he forced the viewer to confront the artifice of the painting itself—to look past the "what" of the image and focus instead on the texture, color, and the physical reality of the paint on canvas.

    This period saw the emergence of works that challenged the very boundaries of the medium. His compositions often oscillated between recognizable figuration and a chaotic, feverish energy. In monumental pieces like Supper in Dresden, he reimagined historical narratives through a lens of disarray and chromatic collision, using striking shades of pink, blue, and black to create a sense of restless, uncontainable energy. His work during this era functioned as an excavation of the human condition, utilizing distortion to express vulnerability and the inherent instability of memory and identity.

    A Lasting Legacy of Provocation

    Throughout his prolific career, Baselitz’s artistic language has been a complex tapestry woven from myriad influences, ranging from the starkness of Socialist Realism and the dramatic tension of Mannerism to the primal rhythms of African sculpture. This eclectic synthesis allowed him to create a body of work that feels both deeply rooted in German history and universally resonant in its exploration of existential struggle. Whether through his commanding oil paintings, his evocative sculptures, or his intricate graphic works, Baselitz has remained steadfast in his commitment to a style characterized by unsettling honesty.

    The historical significance of Georg Baselitz lies in his ability to transform the trauma of the past into a revolutionary aesthetic for the future. He did not merely document destruction; he used it as a tool to rebuild the language of painting. His achievements include:

    Redefining Figuration: Breaking the reliance on narrative content through the radical use of inversion.

    Mastery of Neo-Expressionism: Leading a global revival of emotional, visceral painting in an era of conceptual dominance.

    Exploration of Identity: Using distorted forms to grapple with the complexities of post-war German identity and the fragility of the human form.

    Technical Innovation: Integrating diverse cultural influences into a singular, unmistakable artistic voice that continues to influence generations of painters and sculptors.

    Today, Baselitz stands as one of the most influential figures of the twentieth century, a painter whose work remains a powerful testament to the resilience of creativity in the face of chaos.

    Museum

    Kunsthaus Zürich

    Udstillet i Zürich, Schweiz

    En Sanctuaries af Kunstnerisk Echo: En Udforskning af Kunsthaus Zürich

    Indlejret i hjertet af Zürichs pulserende liv, er Kunsthaus Zürich langt mere end blot et kunstmuseum; det er en fordybende oplevelse, en dialog der strækker sig over århundreder og kunststrømninger. Fra dets beskedne begyndelse som et selskab dedikeret til at fremme værdsættelsen af kunstnerisk udtryk, har museet udviklet sig til Schweiz’ største kulturelle institution – et rum hvor historie pulserer side om side med innovation, og inviterer besøgende på en dybdegående rejse gennem tiden. Luften indenfor synes selv at være infuseret med kreativitet, der lokker til udforskning og eftertanke, og lover et møde, der transcenderer simpel observation. Mere end blot at udstille mesterværker, stræber Kunsthaus efter at belyse deres kontekst, deres indflydelse og deres vedvarende relevans for vores verden.

    Museets fortælling er uløseligt forbundet med dets arkitektoniske udvikling. I første omgang koncepteret af Karl Moser og Robert Curjel i 1910, står den oprindelige bygning som et levende vidnesbyrd om Secession-bevægelsen – en dristig erklæring om uafhængighed fra akademiske begrænsninger. Dens Neo-Grec facade, prydet med intrikate skulpturelle relieffer inspireret af klassisk antikken, etablerer straks museets identitet som en champion af avantgarde-tanke. Men erkendelsen af samlingens eksponentielle vækst førte uundgåeligt til udvidelse. I det 20. århundrede blev tilføjelser omhyggeligt integreret, kulminerede i den betagende 2020-udvidelse af David Chipperfield Architects – en harmonisk samtale mellem gammelt og nyt, der dramatisk forøger rumkapaciteten samtidig med at bevare museets kerneæstetiske principper. Dette er ikke blot en tilføjelse; det er en mesterlig integration af historie og modernitet, der skaber et rum med overraskende intimitet og pragt.

    Secessionens Arv: Mosers Vision

    Hjertet af Kunsthaus’s historie ligger Karl Mosers vision for den oprindelige bygning. Ved at omfavne Secession-bevægelsens principper – en revolutionerende kunststrøm, der prioriterede frihed, eksperimentering og en afvisning af traditionelle akademiske stilarter – søgte Moser at skabe et rum, der afspejlede Zürichs blomstrende kunstneriske ånd. Den Neo-Grec facade, med sine bevidste referencer til klassiske former, var ikke en imitation, men en genfortolkning, infuseret med en distinkt moderne sanselighed. Bygningens indre rum var designet til at være både overdådige og intime, fremme en følelse af opdagelse og opfordre besøgende til at engagere sig dybt med kunsten på udstillingen. Denne indledende design etablerede en arv af dristig kunstnerisk udtryk, der fortsat informerer museets tilgang i dag.

    Udvidelse Over Tid: Integration af Historie og Innovation

    Kunsthaus’s vækst krævede tilpasning, hvilket førte til en række omhyggeligt overvejede arkitektoniske udvidelser gennem det 20. århundrede. Hver tilføjelse blev koncepteret som en respektfuld reaktion på den eksisterende struktur, og sikrede at nye rum harmonerede med museets historiske identitet. Den mest markante transformation kom i 2020 med David Chipperfield Architects’ ambitiøse udvidelse. Denne slående, fristående bygning – et vidnesbyrd om moderne designprincipper – huser samlingen af klassisk modernisme, Bührle Collection, midlertidige udstillinger og kunst fra 1960 og fremefter. Integrationen af dette nye rum forstyrrer ikke den oprindelige; i stedet skaber det en dynamisk dialog mellem fortid og nutid, der tilbyder besøgende en hidtil uset bredde af kunstneriske oplevelser.

    En Fejring af Kunstnerisk Diversitet: Fra Monet til Giacometti

    Indenfor dets vægge har Kunsthaus Zürich en ekstraordinær samling spændende over århundreder og kontinenter. Besøgende kan forsvinde ind i de lysende landskaber fra Claude Monet – fange flygtige øjeblikke af lys og atmosfære med hans signatur Impressionistiske penselstrøg. Museets dedikation til Alberto Giacomettis skulpturer – ofte præget af en hjerteskærende skrøbelighed og eksistentiel vægt – afslører kunstnerens dybe engagement med menneskelig form og kompleksiteten i den moderne tilstand. Ud over disse ikoniske værker omfatter samlingen mesterværker af Edvard Munch, Pablo Picasso, Chagall, Kokoschka, Beckmann og utallige andre – et vidnesbyrd om museets forpligtelse til at vise kunstnerisk diversitet på tværs af tider og bevægelser. Kunsthaus huser også en betydelig samling schweizisk kunst, herunder værker af Füssli, Segantini, Hodler, Vallotton og Zürich concrete kunstnere som Bill, Glarner og Loewensberg.

    Nutidige Strømme: Engagerende Ideer og Stemmer

    Kunsthaus Zürich er ikke blot et museum for fortiden; det dyrker aktivt dialog med nutidig kunst. Det giver en vital platform for innovative installationer, tankevækkende udstillinger og engagerende programmer, der udfordrer konventioner og fremkalder refleksion. Fra multimedieundersøgelser til interaktive oplevelser inviterer museet besøgende til at grapple med presserende samfundsmæssige spørgsmål gennem kunstnerisk kreativitet – bekræfter sin rolle som et fyrtårn af intellektuel nysgerrighed og kulturel dynamik. I øjeblikket er museet dedikeret til at fremvise værker af kunstnere såsom Pipilotti Rist og Peter Fischli/David Weiss, der afspejler en forpligtelse til at omfavne nye stemmer og perspektiver i kunstverdenen.

    Useful Links:

    Kunsthaus Zürich - Wikipedia:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kunsthaus_Z%C3%BCrich

    Kunsthaus Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland - Google Arts & Culture:

    https://artsandculture.google.com/partner/kunsthaus-zuerich

    David Chipperfield Architects - Kunsthaus Zürich:

    https://davidchipperfield.com/projects/kunsthaus-zurich

    Her kan du læse mere

    Findes online

    QR-kode med link til downloadside for Supper in Dresden

    artsdot.com/da/art/download/georg-baselitz-supper-in-dresden-D3XNP8-en/

    Kildehenvisning til dette kunstværk

    MLA
    Baselitz, Georg. Supper in Dresden. 1983, Kunsthaus Zürich. https://artsdot.com/da/art/georg-baselitz-supper-in-dresden-D3XNP8-en/
    APA
    Baselitz, Georg (1983). Supper in Dresden [Painting]. Kunsthaus Zürich. https://artsdot.com/da/art/georg-baselitz-supper-in-dresden-D3XNP8-en/
    Chicago
    Georg Baselitz. Supper in Dresden. 1983. Kunsthaus Zürich. https://artsdot.com/da/art/georg-baselitz-supper-in-dresden-D3XNP8-en/
    Harvard
    Baselitz, Georg (1983) Supper in Dresden. Kunsthaus Zürich. Available at: https://artsdot.com/da/art/georg-baselitz-supper-in-dresden-D3XNP8-en/

    Kig nærmere efter

    Supper in Dresden — Georg Baselitz

    Kig nærmere

    Svar med dine egne ord. Der er ingen forkerte svar her – kun svar, som du kan forklare.

    1. Hvad fanger dit øje først, og hvorfor?
    2. Hvilke farver eller former skaber stemningen — og hvad er den stemning?
    3. Vores katalog klassificerer dette værk under: neo-expressionism, figures at table, inverted figures. Er du enig? Hvad ville du tilføje eller fjerne?
    4. Se tilbage på Der Ausgang - Karl (1987) tidligere i denne guide. Nævn to ting, som det har til fælles med dette værk, og én ting, der er forskellig.
    5. Neo-Expressionism: A rough, urgent return to figure painting in the 1980s, after years of cool abstraction. Hvor kan du se det i dette værk?

    Dit svar

    Skriv et kort afsnit om dette kunstværk. Brug fakta fra de tidligere dele af denne guide samt dine svar ovenfor.